South Korea will scrap an intelligence-sharing pact with Japan, drawing a swift protest from Tokyo and deepening a decades-old dispute over history that has hit trade and undercut security cooperation over North Korea.
- The pact was aimed at countering North Korean nuclear and missile threats
- The latest move is an escalation from trade tensions between South Korea and Japan
- Tokyo has summoned the South Korean ambassador in protest of the decision
The General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) was designed to share information on the threat posed by North Korea and its missile and nuclear activities — a threat underlined by the North’s recent launch of a series of short-range ballistic missiles.
Explaining its decision, South Korea’s Kim You-geun, a deputy director of the presidential National Security Council (NSC), said Japan had created a “grave change” in the environment for bilateral security cooperation by removing South Korea’s fast-track export status this month.
“Under this situation, we have determined that it would not serve our national interest to maintain an agreement we signed with the aim of exchanging military information which is sensitive to security,” Mr Kim said.
Relations between the north-east Asian neighbours began to deteriorate late last year following a diplomatic row over compensation for wartime forced labourers during Japan’s occupation of Korea.
They soured further when Japan tightened its curbs on exports of high-tech materials needed by South Korea’s chip industry and again this month when Tokyo said it would remove South Korea’s fast-track export status.
Japan’s foreign minister, Taro Kono, criticised Seoul for what he said was mixing the export controls with security issues.
“Given such issues as North Korea, everyone probably understands the importance of this agreement. But this decision was made while linking it to Japan’s review of export controls,” he told reporters.
“I cannot help saying they are completely misreading the security environment.”
He said Tokyo had summoned the South Korean ambassador in protest.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo weighed in, saying he was disappointed by South Korea’s decision to end the intelligence-sharing agreement with Japan.
South Korea and Japan are both US allies and the US fears weakened security cooperation.
Pentagon spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Dave Eastburn also expressed concern.
“We strongly believe that the integrity of our mutual defence and security ties must persist despite frictions in other areas of the [South Korea]-Japan relationship,” he said.
South Korea’s foreign minister, Kang Kyung-wha, emphasised that the decision to end the intelligence pact was because South Korea had lost trust in Japan.
“We will continue to strengthen cooperation with the United States and develop the alliance,” she told reporters in Seoul.
One Western military source said the intelligence-sharing was sometimes limited but nevertheless an important area of cooperation in the face of threats from North Korea.
North Korea’s Kim Jong-un and South Korea’s Moon Jae-in are warming ties between the two countries. (AP: Korea Summit Press Pool)
GSOMIA facilitated the sharing of information on North Korea’s nuclear and missile threats, which remain despite a series of summits and negotiations with North Korea, said Cho Tae-yong, a former South Korean national security adviser who worked on the deal when it was first signed.
“Ending GSOMIA is not only the wrong card to play to press Japan, but it is just not helpful for our security,” he said.
The decision also comes as China and Russia have been more assertive in the region, flying their first joint military air patrol together in July, which triggered an international incident with South Korea and Japan.
The fraught issue of South Korean women who say they were subjected to sexual slavery and labour exploitation during World War II has impacted diplomatic relations for decades. (ABC)
Before the signing of the agreement in 2016, under US pressure, South Korea and Japan shared intelligence through the United States.
South Korea went ahead with the deal at the time despite opposition from some political parties and a large section of the public, who remain bitter over Japan’s actions during its colonial rule of Korea from 1910 until the end of World War II.
A 2012 attempt to seal the deal fell apart in the face of opposition in South Korea toward military cooperation with Japan.
Relations between the two US allies now appear to be at their lowest since they normalised ties in 1965, plagued by bitterness over Japan’s occupation, which included the use of South Korean forced labour at some Japanese firms.
Seoul said the moves by Japan were in retaliation for a South Korean Supreme Court order for Japanese companies to compensate some of their wartime forced laborers last October.
Japan condemned that ruling, saying the matter was resolved by a 1965 treaty normalising ties.
It has also cited unspecified security reasons for its export controls.